Hi I’m Jack:
A Scientist & Street Photographer.
Street Photography is how I document life…
Nikon’s Last DSLR is bigger, slower, more expensive than their cheapest full-frame mirrorless camera. Why would anyone pick this over a fresh start? While Nikon have Z-mount updates for almost all their F-mount glass, there are still holes in the lineup. After testing 3 legendary F primes against their closest Z counterparts, the truth is nothing comes close. Is this reason enough to double down on the last DSLR, or is it time for a fresh start?
Flagship cameras have become so overkill, that their specs have over flowed? The Nikon Zf, ZR and Z5ii aren’t cheap, but for the price they’re resetting the full-frame standard. That no-brainer, go to recommendation for around $2000, but if I can only choose one? It’d have to be the camera I’d want to use as my everyday carry, so on my day off so I brought all three, each paired with a 40, to document my home-town city
An f1.2 prime trilogy makes sense for pros covering events or weddings. That’s not me? As an enthusiast, I choose gear I can afford to carry, so what would it take for me to lug around these huge primes? I took the Nikkor 35mm, 50mm, 85mm f1.2 S Z lenses out at night, to see how they change my work in low-light?As an enthusiast creating just for fun, which of these would I pick if I can only have one?